Stuff and nonsense
Jan. 4th, 2009 11:21 pmThe BBC are reporting that a study involving allegedly haunted vaults under South Bridge (oh, and also some palace or other in London) has found evidence of clustering in reported experiences similar to hauntings. What they don't say is what people were apparently experiencing. Given that those vaults have been empty for most of their history, I do wonder what that happened there would be said to be affecting people - was it the ghosts of indie clubs past, perhaps, or ectoplasmic music characterised by a succession of regular beats?
In other news, I've been reading a couple of historical essays on the idea that Odin was a historical figure. I'm not convinced, but the ground they tangentially cover's very interesting.I got given some Ecoballs too. These, in case you're not familiar with them, are plastic balls (well, balls with a collar that make them look slightly Saturnine) containing small pellets, which are claimed to clean your clothes without normally needing any washing powder.
I'm not convinced. In fact, as far as I can tell they rely entirely on people not being familiar with how clean warm water and agitation can get their clothes. I will, though, just quote you some of the guff that comes along with them.
You're gonna like this.
Q. How do the Ecoballs™ work?
A. Ecoballs™ increase the degree of alkaline.
In the water Ecoballs™ will react with stain/dirt under saponification [ . . . ] the Activated water molecule filters easily into the inside of clothing fibre and and makes combination between filth and fibre[1] loose [ . . . ] I.e. the Ecoballs™ makes the molecule of the water smaller which returns the water to having its brilliant hydrating properties, high solubility and good permeability.
So there you go. We've been using soap all these years when all we needed to do was shrink the water. How foolish we've all been.
Went for a walk around town yesterday in opposition to current events. Bumped into Nuala and Alex (and little Aisling, who mostly slept). Ken was apparently there too, but I didn't see him.
[1]: "Filth and fibre". I think I've got an EP by them.
In other news, I've been reading a couple of historical essays on the idea that Odin was a historical figure. I'm not convinced, but the ground they tangentially cover's very interesting.I got given some Ecoballs too. These, in case you're not familiar with them, are plastic balls (well, balls with a collar that make them look slightly Saturnine) containing small pellets, which are claimed to clean your clothes without normally needing any washing powder.
I'm not convinced. In fact, as far as I can tell they rely entirely on people not being familiar with how clean warm water and agitation can get their clothes. I will, though, just quote you some of the guff that comes along with them.
You're gonna like this.
Q. How do the Ecoballs™ work?
A. Ecoballs™ increase the degree of alkaline.
In the water Ecoballs™ will react with stain/dirt under saponification [ . . . ] the Activated water molecule filters easily into the inside of clothing fibre and and makes combination between filth and fibre[1] loose [ . . . ] I.e. the Ecoballs™ makes the molecule of the water smaller which returns the water to having its brilliant hydrating properties, high solubility and good permeability.
So there you go. We've been using soap all these years when all we needed to do was shrink the water. How foolish we've all been.
Went for a walk around town yesterday in opposition to current events. Bumped into Nuala and Alex (and little Aisling, who mostly slept). Ken was apparently there too, but I didn't see him.
[1]: "Filth and fibre". I think I've got an EP by them.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-04 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-04 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-04 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 06:33 pm (UTC)Now all I have to do is convince them to stop using palm oil.
Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 12:27 am (UTC)"Higher alkyl sulfate, non-ionic surfactant, sodium metasilicate, calcium carbonate, sodium carbonate"
My chemistry's rusty, but aren't those first two ingredients detergents?
Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 12:41 am (UTC)Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 09:44 am (UTC)Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 10:54 am (UTC)Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 10:57 am (UTC)Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 12:32 pm (UTC)Personally I'm greatly influenced by advertising, and go out of my way to avoid products whose ads are annoying ("HI, I'M BARRY SCOTT, AND I'M CONFUSED.....DOT COM), misleading ("...contains no pesticides except the ones we put in to kill the headlice - models styled with lash inserts and enhanced in post-production), utterly bizarre ("Contains NO CHEMICALS"), or powered by distilled essence of pseudoscience.
I realise this may occasionally be my loss, but it's worth it.
Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 01:14 pm (UTC)Do you buy much mascara, then? Enquiring minds...
The majority of shampoo and cosmetic advertisements use some degree of pre-production (false lashes, hair extensions) or post-production (airbrushing) enhancements. It's only recently, though, that they've been called on it and made to state some aspects of it in the small print.
http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk is good on this sort of guff.
Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 01:28 pm (UTC)I realise why the disclaimers are in the adverts now (in small print, in the corner, with plenty going on elsewhere to distract your attention from them) but at the end of the day they're still selling mascara using false lashes & Photoshop, and I can't understand why the ASA let them get away with it! 8-/
And as for the 'anti-ageing' products to use "if you're not ready for cosmetic surgery yet"... grrrrr!
Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 02:26 pm (UTC)I vote that 'dermabrasion' is renamed 'flesh sanding' and then see how many people sign up for it.
Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 01:44 pm (UTC)Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-05 01:15 pm (UTC)Reminds me of the whole 'Boswelox' thing - the innovative 'new' face cream ingredient that turned out to be an extract from the Boswellia plant. AKA frankincense. So only in use for a few THOUSAND years, then!
Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-08 06:37 pm (UTC)Re: Hmm...
Date: 2009-01-08 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 07:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 09:36 am (UTC)Just keep them away from black tshirts - one got wrapped up in my black motorhead tshirt and now I have a black tshirt with bleached brown splodges.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 11:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 11:22 pm (UTC)Erm, doesn't this mean that they work if you add soap?