According to
this Reuters report,
"a senior medical official" in Moscow has stated that of the 117 hostages who have died during or since the assault on the Nord Ost Theatre yesterday, only one died of gunshot wounds. The rest seem to have died of the effects of the gas used to overpower the gunmen holding the hostages.
There is also speculation from a London-based "security expert" that the gas used, judging by the symptoms displayed by the hostages, may have been BZ, which they describe as a "colourless, odourless incapacitant with hallucinogenic properties". What they don't say is that the stuff has a truly evil reputation and was abandoned by the US in the sixties after tests showed that it was too unpredictable in its effects for military use.
The film "Jacob's Ladder" is based on stories of tests of BZ in Vietnam.
Also, Gore Vidal (that whinging liberal cryptocommunist) has an article in the
Observer today, concerning the ongoing debâcle that is Western (specifically US-driven Western) policy towards the Middle East and central Asia. A lot of it is exactly what you'd expect from one of us recidivist self-hating hypocritical pro-evil lunatics, but he did raise a couple of points which I found quite puzzling.
The US, of course, like most western nations, has a relatively complex air defence system which is not at the high alert status that it used to be. Time was we were constantly regaled by stories of Russian heavy bombers testing British air responses by mounting sneak attacks at only several hours' notice, flying round the north of Norway and down past Iceland with only our massive Radar sets to tell us they were coming. Of course, our plucky Phantom pilots were ready and snoozing, waiting to be woken at the correct time to have a cup of tea and pop upstairs to meet them as they arrived without wasting too much fuel and make them go home again. We were assured that this could be done at a couple of minutes notice, day or night, 365 days a year. So the revelation that the US only had four interceptors ready on the day was a bit surprising. After all, there's a permanent no-fly zone over nearly all of DC precisely to prevent attacks, and has been for decades. Andrews Air Force base is supposed to be on permanent readiness for this.
So why did all four of those planes stay on the ground until it was all over? There's been no word that they flew, and Vidal believes that the order to fly came an hour and twenty minutes after the alarm was initially raised. What was going on here? Could it have been incompetence? History is littered with the bodies of military officers executed for lesser fuck-ups, and as far as I know no charges have been brought. Has anyone been carpeted over this? And where is the major enquiry into how the planes reached their targets?
It only seems to be in the print edition, but there's a brief summary
here.
Best interpretation : they're cynically covering their backs to avoid having to explain why they ignored the danger signs.
Worst interpretation : No, let's not go there. Never ascribe to malice what can safely be put down to incompetence.