![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
According to the Reg, the Chromosome 16 paper is out. I didn't have anything to do with 16, and from the list of contributors I don't think anyone I know did either.
If you're interested in which chromosomes have had this sort of paper published so far, there's a diagram here. (As you've probably guessed, this entry is mainly for my own reference - I'm going to shamelessly leave it public regardless, though).
Hang on a minute . . .
Nobody told me 13 was out! They'd bloody better have some reprints left . . .
[Slightly later]
Goddammit, how much more are they not telling me about?
If you're interested in which chromosomes have had this sort of paper published so far, there's a diagram here. (As you've probably guessed, this entry is mainly for my own reference - I'm going to shamelessly leave it public regardless, though).
Hang on a minute . . .
You bastards!
Nobody told me 13 was out! They'd bloody better have some reprints left . . .
[Slightly later]
Goddammit, how much more are they not telling me about?
no subject
Date: 2004-12-24 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-24 05:44 pm (UTC)There used to be a nice chart on the Sanger's website of which areas of which chromosomes were being done by which centres. It doesn't seem to be there anymore.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-24 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-24 05:54 pm (UTC)I think what they meant (or what they should have meant) is that the JGI are the first of the Big Five to finish publishing papers on "their" chromosomes. The first to publish a paper was, of course [modest cough] us, but we've still got a couple to finish analysing - most obviously, the big one, Chromosome One, which is about a tenth of the genome on its own.