Page Summary
ex-lark-asc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zotz - (no subject)
blackmetalbaz.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kiaransalyn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zotz - (no subject)
zotz - (no subject)
reddragdiva - (no subject)
ex-wendles389.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kiaransalyn.livejournal.com - The sober rant.
nmg.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ex-lark-asc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kiaransalyn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zotz - (no subject)
zotz - (no subject)
zotz - (no subject)
perverse-idol.livejournal.com - Re: The sober rant.
reddragdiva - (no subject)
king-prawn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
astatine210.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 03:33 am (UTC)(Yes, it's Vicky, I changed my acocunt name :)
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 04:25 am (UTC)I haven't actually read the Dirk Gently stuff, but I was told at the time which ideas from Shada turned up in them. Some very good ones.
I've not known anyone change their journal name. An obscure first, but a first regardless.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 04:43 am (UTC)I lost interest in the books some time in the middle of the 'New Adventures' run, and although some of the 'Missing Adventures' were fairly diverting, the principle kinda annoyed me. Milking the cash cow and all that... I've still got all the Target novelisations at home in Yorkshire though :-) I'm not entirely sure Paul McGann is going to be able to live up Tom Baker, even though I thought he was pretty good a few years back.
Still, it'll just be great to have some 'Doctor Who' back on TV again
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 05:06 am (UTC)As for Doctor Who, it is about time we had a decent update of this. And more Daleks, we need more Daleks. Davros was the original Cyber-Goth! *goes on to his usual Davros/CyberGoth rant*
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 05:08 am (UTC)Monday, 6pm, Radio 4. Apparently.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 05:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 05:22 am (UTC)My God, you're right. Please, pointer to said usual rant.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 05:22 am (UTC)The sober rant.
Date: 2002-11-15 06:05 am (UTC)It's a much better rant when I'm not sober. You should have asked me on Saturday.
Still, it gives you some idea.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 06:39 am (UTC)From what I can gather, this is an audio production, not a television production. The first broadcast is likely to be a webcast (ack), which is incidentally why I described it as 'an audio production'. Bah.
I have a feeling that DNA, the acknowledged master of idea recycling, would be impressed by the longevity of Shada, given that the original half-finished story had a mid-nineties video release, was used in part as stock footage during the otherwise cringeworthy Five Doctors story and had its plot recycled as Dirk Gently's etc.
(and to think - I don't regard myself as a Doctor Who fan)
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 07:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 07:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 07:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 07:43 am (UTC)Re: The sober rant.
Date: 2002-11-15 09:44 am (UTC)As far as I can see, neither is any Cybergoth's face, so he's pretty safe there. *grins*
Assuming you read this (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/15/0011225&mode=thread&tid=129) by the way?
no subject
Date: 2002-11-15 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-16 07:16 am (UTC)Poo.
for_example
no subject
Date: 2002-11-27 04:19 pm (UTC)