I feel like I've had a heavy evening headbanging. My neck turns about half as far as usual and then hurts like a bastard. I think it's just me having slept in an awkward position, though. Hopefully it'll clear up during the day.
There's going to be a street party in Marchmont on Saturday. There were a couple of leaflets left at the front door last night about it. If you read the story, it's very strange (assuming you know Marchmont at all).
EDINBURGH residents and students who have been at loggerheads over claims that their area was becoming a "student ghetto" are to hold a massive street party later this month, designed to reunite the community.
Now, when I moved to Edinburgh in the summer of 1986, one of the first things I learned was that marchmont was a student ghetto, due to being very pleasant, within easy walking distance of nearly all of the University and not cripplingly expensive. I suspect - and those who've lived in Edinburgh rather longer than me may care to comment on this - that it was a long way from being a recent thing even then. So what's this bit about it "becoming" a student ghetto?
And while we're at it, who are this MAGPIE bunch anyway? I've seen them mentioned in the papers, but I haven't heard anything from them directly. As a local owner-occupier, surely I'm exactly the sort of person they seek to represent and whose opinions they should be interested in? "Residents are campaigning"? It sounds more like a few busybodies shitstirring to me. The flat above me's got students in it, and has done for the last couple of years, and for the period of a few years before I went to Cambridge too. I don't remember any problems. And some of the students are very decorative. I have friends who've had problems with noisy neighbours, and I haven't noticed any tendency for it to be students. Are students really more trouble than people generally?
David Stay, the secretary of MAGPIE, said the Executive needs to "realise this is a problem" and to prevent any more students moving in to the area.
Remember, all Lebensraum means is "living room". And we're all in favour of bigger living-rooms, aren't we? </injoke>
In other local news, there seems to be a little movement on the rebuilding of the Cowgate fire site. Not before time, either.
Finally, following the speculation a while back about contacting Kaija, I was wondering during a quiet moment yesterday whether the SCA-group member was particularly likely to actually be her . . . and I guess the answer's Yes.
Apropos of a vague coment by
tals, the Beeb have the Toyota Hilux video up online. If you didn't see this when it was on the box, the story is simple : Top Gear decided to see how badly you could mistreat one and still have it drivable. The answer turned out to be "really quite badly".
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:02 am (UTC)Marchmont's lovely.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:08 am (UTC)Hopefully it'll be a good party. I've half a mind to go along in the hope of buttonholing journalists and sharing my halfbaked opinions with them. Possibly forcibly.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:28 am (UTC)http://www.thalia.org/kender/Pics/Pennsic/Pennsic98/Kaija2.jpg
so I guess there might be something in it.
Haven't see her for years though, since the last time I bumped into her in Newington about a year after she left.
[1] is this a proper word yet?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:37 am (UTC)Well, it's instantly understandable.
Kaija was back in Britain with a friend called Vince about six years ago, and I saw her in DC a few months later. I mailed her a couple of years back, but that address seems to have evaporated since then.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:53 am (UTC)Why not? It seems that more than a fair share of busybodies have already done so, with opinions that are probably even less worked out than yours. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 10:58 am (UTC)Jenny and I - one student, one working
Martin and Tessa - working (civil service or insurance or similar)
Mrs King - maybe working (married to a sailor who turned up very occasionally, but kept a suitcase in the hall cupboard)
Two girls, not far past school-leaving age, with a serious fondness for binliners, safety pins and hair dye - about to become students, but nver quite did.
That was downstairs. Upstairs we had
Peter and Mabel - Polish and German bohemian types - he painted (quite well. I've seen some of his stuff in shops since returning to Edinburgh), she Wrote. Together they fought
crimea lot.Richard - apparently once one of the most senior scientologists in mainland China.
Steve - scandinavian theology student. Hardly ever spoke.
The last room had between one and three students from Lewis at any given time.
So, just over a dozen people of whom about four were students, and maybe another four could have been taken for students by the neighbours.
Admittedly the other five flats on the stair were all families, so I'm not sure what, if anything, the above proves.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:08 am (UTC)I lived in Marchmont as a student in 91-92 and it was definitely a student area then.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:12 am (UTC)As the token old fart on your list (Graham), yes, I would agree that an area becoming almost entirely student-occupied is a problem for the owner occupiers and I can see where they're coming from. My stair (Bruntsfield) used to be mainly owner occupiers and is now mainly students (only 3 O/O s left apparently). Some are fine but some, naturellement have a tendency to play very loud music at 4am on returning from clubbing on school nights. Real workers for obvious reasons are less prone to this. One lot a few years back nearly drove me to violence.
But the main issue is that the infrastructure declines. To give an example, on my stair the collective payment for getting the back green mowed has collapsed; the collective stair cleaning is on the point of collapsing becaus the studnts won't pay the cleaners - why should they? they don't own it and they'll move on in 9 months max. Similarly for minor repairs like drains. Getting hold of absentee landlords, often in other countries is a nightmare. I have actually decided it is untenable to go on living in my own flat and I should get out before it starts to affect the price of my flat. The stair is increasingky manky and looks it.
So yes Marchmont is lovely (I would move there if I could afford it, despite the student occupancy, but I'd damn sure get a main door flat), but no, living with predominantly HMO occupancy is not all groovy fun stair and street opartie and lots of ganja every night, man :-)
Ps the street festival looks fun, thanks for telling me!! see you there perhaps..
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:37 am (UTC)This sort of thing is not exclusive to students though, in general any house that is rented out rather than owner occupied will not be maintained to the same level, the tenants won't bother with the garden etc. And it's a problem in a lot of areas these days.