Monster Raving Ego Post.
May. 29th, 2004 11:52 amNature has just published papers on the content of two more human chromosomes - chromosome 9 and chromosome 10. I am, of course, very pleased, but also very slightly annoyed that they've spelt my name wrong. I should, IIRC, also be included for 1 and X, whenever they get documented. I found this out when I got an email from an ex-associate asking if I'd like her to score a copy and send it up. Yes, I think I would, thanks.
In news of more general interest, how many of you heard that the the first released version of the chimp genome is being analysed? No, me neither. It seems to have had very little attention, in spite of the undoubted significance. After all, there are important biological differences between us and our hairy cousins which have (I assume) been important in allowing us to do all the stuff we've done while they've stuck to their own (doubtless more important) activities. A draft version has been available since about December, and apparently when examined the sequence-level differences between them and us are quite interesting.
A final word from one of the papers on the Y-chromosome :
Reports of the demise of the Y chromosome and an impending extinction of men may have been exaggerated. The Y's full genome sequence reveals that we have underestimated its powers of self-preservation.
Instead of doubling up to protect its genetic cargo like other chromosomes, the lone Y safeguards its genes by having sex with itself, an international consortium has found.
No further comment, OK?
But in other news, there's a controversial new art event in London. (Thanks to NTK for that one)
And I've just been to the pub with
nickys and
original_aj. It's been a long long time since that happened. I must do it again, real soon.
In news of more general interest, how many of you heard that the the first released version of the chimp genome is being analysed? No, me neither. It seems to have had very little attention, in spite of the undoubted significance. After all, there are important biological differences between us and our hairy cousins which have (I assume) been important in allowing us to do all the stuff we've done while they've stuck to their own (doubtless more important) activities. A draft version has been available since about December, and apparently when examined the sequence-level differences between them and us are quite interesting.
A final word from one of the papers on the Y-chromosome :
Reports of the demise of the Y chromosome and an impending extinction of men may have been exaggerated. The Y's full genome sequence reveals that we have underestimated its powers of self-preservation.
Instead of doubling up to protect its genetic cargo like other chromosomes, the lone Y safeguards its genes by having sex with itself, an international consortium has found.
No further comment, OK?
But in other news, there's a controversial new art event in London. (Thanks to NTK for that one)
And I've just been to the pub with