Accidental (?) exposure.
Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:17 pmTwo different takes linked to by news.google.co.uk concerning the "wardrobe malfunction":
White Plains Journal News : The big question: Was Jackson exposure planned?
Edmonton Journal : Bare breast not nearly as offensive as cynical American jingoism
Whoops. Somebody's not impressed. I think it was the Kid Rock song they objected to.
White Plains Journal News : The big question: Was Jackson exposure planned?
Edmonton Journal : Bare breast not nearly as offensive as cynical American jingoism
Whoops. Somebody's not impressed. I think it was the Kid Rock song they objected to.
Liked that "Hymn to Rednecks" bit.
Date: 2004-02-03 06:29 am (UTC)For heaven's sake, it's just a breast. I see 'em every day. And yeah, it was the best part of that snoozalicious show. ::zzzzzzzz::
no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 06:49 am (UTC)Well, what else did they expect? Actually it seems that the more extravagant the entry price, the less live the performance. Hey, there's a thought. Perhaps if we can persuade the promoters to rake up the admission to a ridiculous £300 per head, we could see the pleasure of Janet Jackson et al 'performing' from the afterlife?
no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 10:25 am (UTC)I find this particularly upsetting because I'm all for flag burning being legal as a form of protest, and yet I suspect because of that I have more respect for Old Glory than anyone who has ever wrapped hirself in it. I hesitate to ask what that portion of the halftime travesty did to my father's heart condition.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 11:11 am (UTC)And now America, and Boston in particular, can get back to worrying about what really matters. Pitchers and catchers report to spring training in 10 days. :)